freedom of speech that is only made for people like Arundhati Roy to Geelani to Bukhari.
In PaSt when, Subramanian Swamy was dismissed from Harvard after decades of teaching association. His fault - he dared to say the fact as a fact, he dared to say the unsaid, and he dared to shoot the pseudos right in the middle of their forehead.Yes, all this happened when Dr. Swami wrote an article advocating denial of voting rights to non-Hindus with the goal of stemming terrorist attacks in India. And as expected the pseudos almost choked to death. Now they are trying to get some fresh air by dismissing him as ‘communal’, ‘anti-Islamic’ and a ‘Hindu fanatic’.
Many are stung by Dr. Swami’s article – from Congress to Congress bought media to Arabs and to the hypocrite Americans. They needed to do something urgently because if they don’t then Dr. Swami with his forty years of credibility could almost turn the tide against their well-established norms of freedom of speech - freedom of speech that is only made for people like Arundhati Roy to Geelani to Bukhari.
So therefore they kicked him out. When these high profile institutes, with a bunch of ‘highly politicized faculty’ get the colors of Islamic-mania and preach the theory of ‘political correctness’ – correctness that suits their political interests only – it is a very dangerous sign. Of course, when it receives millions in aid from people like Prince Alwaleed of Saudi Arabia, it does not leave much scope for them either.
In words of Prof. Phyllis Chesler – “This situation affects us all. The West must understand that silencing men like Professor Swamy is in a sense an act of Jihad. We are aiding the Islamic fundamentalists in their quest for domination in India and South Central Asia.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment